Comments on: +2 mechanikal melee weapon v1 http://www.hecate.ca/union/2006/04/10/2-mechanikal-melee-weapon/ All things mechanikal, magikal, clockwerk, and mundane Thu, 05 May 2011 15:37:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: spyder http://www.hecate.ca/union/2006/04/10/2-mechanikal-melee-weapon/comment-page-1/#comment-79 spyder Mon, 03 Jul 2006 03:11:17 +0000 http://www.hecate.ca/union/2006/04/10/2-mechanikal-melee-weapon/#comment-79 sorry about the wait i was in b/w jobs. ok i see your point. it is changed. people kept saying i was wrong but never had a good example. when i checked the books i never checked p377. that was the kicker. but just a question where did they get 177xp for a conduit(3 plates)? cause in the LM it says a conduit(3 plates) is 281 wich would cause soul drain.thanks. i\'ll get to other one when i\'m off next. sorry about the wait i was in b/w jobs. ok i see your point. it is changed. people kept saying i was wrong but never had a good example. when i checked the books i never checked p377. that was the kicker. but just a question where did they get 177xp for a conduit(3 plates)? cause in the LM it says a conduit(3 plates) is 281 wich would cause soul drain.thanks. i\’ll get to other one when i\’m off next.

]]> By: netminder69 http://www.hecate.ca/union/2006/04/10/2-mechanikal-melee-weapon/comment-page-1/#comment-40 netminder69 Thu, 18 May 2006 13:10:49 +0000 http://www.hecate.ca/union/2006/04/10/2-mechanikal-melee-weapon/#comment-40 You only need one series conduit to link the two plates together. Look at the examples int he IKCG Specifically you can check out the example on page 332 for the flameguard plate, it has 2 +1 enhancement runeplates and only has one series conduit. If you don't like that example for what it says, then check out the expanded example on page 377. You only need one series conduit to link the two plates together. Look at the examples int he IKCG Specifically you can check out the example on page 332 for the flameguard plate, it has 2 +1 enhancement runeplates and only has one series conduit. If you don’t like that example for what it says, then check out the expanded example on page 377.

]]> By: spyder http://www.hecate.ca/union/2006/04/10/2-mechanikal-melee-weapon/comment-page-1/#comment-24 spyder Tue, 11 Apr 2006 20:44:34 +0000 http://www.hecate.ca/union/2006/04/10/2-mechanikal-melee-weapon/#comment-24 it does. 1+1=2(rune plate), 1+1=2(conduits). it does. 1+1=2(rune plate), 1+1=2(conduits).

]]> By: burrowowl http://www.hecate.ca/union/2006/04/10/2-mechanikal-melee-weapon/comment-page-1/#comment-22 burrowowl Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:03:23 +0000 http://www.hecate.ca/union/2006/04/10/2-mechanikal-melee-weapon/#comment-22 Not to nitpick, but I suspect that the second "series conduit" should be replaced by the normal conduit for a +2 weapon (cost-to-make 1,800gp + 144xp) instead, as the final assembly an fusion of a mechanikal weapon should reflect the total effective bonus of the item. Also, it may be appropriate to not include the cost of schematics in the final market value, as it is quite possible for the same mechanik to make multiple copies from the same plans. Perhaps this is where the creator gets his "wiggle room" to haggle with? Not to nitpick, but I suspect that the second “series conduit” should be replaced by the normal conduit for a +2 weapon (cost-to-make 1,800gp + 144xp) instead, as the final assembly an fusion of a mechanikal weapon should reflect the total effective bonus of the item.

Also, it may be appropriate to not include the cost of schematics in the final market value, as it is quite possible for the same mechanik to make multiple copies from the same plans. Perhaps this is where the creator gets his “wiggle room” to haggle with?

]]>